Mid-range · 2024
vivo T3
Our Take
CPU benches near recent mid-range phones like the Samsung Galaxy A55
A solid mid-ranger with all-day battery and an AMOLED screen.
Best for
Streaming · social · long days out
Strength
All-day battery (5000mAh), AMOLED screen
Full specifications
What stands out
Hi-Res audio for higher-quality listening
Display
6.67″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Display
6.67″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Performance
Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) · 8-core 2.8 GHz · Mali-G610 MC4
Everyday capable
Performance
Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) · 8-core 2.8 GHz · Mali-G610 MC4
Everyday capable
Daily apps and casual games run smoothly — heavy gaming will drop frames.
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K
Stabilised main camera holds up in low light. Front camera is fine for daylight selfies.
Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
OIS
Front camera
16 MP f/2.0
Main sensor
Sony IMX882, 1/1.95", 0.8µm
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video
Battery
5000 mAh · 44 W wired
Plenty
Battery
5000 mAh · 44 W wired
Plenty
Audio
Stereo · Hi-Res
Stereo speakers
Audio
Stereo · Hi-Res
Stereo speakers
Speakers
Stereo
Stereo
Hi-Res audio
Supported
Audio features
Hi-Res audio
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 6
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 6
Build & Design
5 g · 7.8 mm · IP54
Build & Design
5 g · 7.8 mm · IP54
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, flicker
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 16
Trades blows
2 wins
3 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.67″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2400 vs 1179 × 2556 resolution
40% larger battery capacity
44 W vs 25 W charging · 5,000 mAh vs 3,561 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
735k vs 1.9M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs Flagship tier
Lower video ceiling
4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
25% larger battery capacity
44 W vs 25 W charging · 5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.67″ vs 6.2″ screen
Lower benchmark score
735k vs 1.9M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs Flagship tier
Lower video ceiling
4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the vivo T3.