Mid-range · 2022
vivo S16e
Our Take
CPU benches near recent mid-range phones like the Samsung Galaxy A55
A solid mid-ranger with 66W fast charging and an AMOLED screen.
Best for
Streaming · reading · social
Strength
66W fast charging, AMOLED screen
Full specifications
Display
6.62″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Display
6.62″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Performance
Exynos 1080 (5 nm) · 8-core 2.8 GHz · Mali-G78 MP10
Everyday capable
Performance
Exynos 1080 (5 nm) · 8-core 2.8 GHz · Mali-G78 MP10
Everyday capable
Daily apps and casual games run smoothly — heavy gaming will drop frames.
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K
Stabilised main camera holds up in low light. Front camera is fine for daylight selfies.
Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
OIS
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
16 MP f/2.0
Main sensor
Samsung S5KJN1, 1/2.76", 0.64µm
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video
Battery
4600 mAh · 66 W wired
Battery
4600 mAh · 66 W wired
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 6
Modern radios
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 6
Modern radios
Build & Design
7 g · 7.7 mm
Build & Design
7 g · 7.7 mmHeight
162.5 mm
Width
75.8 mm
Thickness
7.7 mm
Weight
7 g
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 14
Trades blows
2 wins
2 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.62″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2400 vs 1170 × 2532 resolution
40% larger battery capacity
66 W vs 15 W charging · 4,600 mAh vs 3,279 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
720k vs 1.4M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs High-end tier
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection
vs
Samsung Galaxy S22 5G
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
24% larger battery capacity
66 W vs 25 W charging · 4,600 mAh vs 3,700 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.62″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
720k vs 1.0M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs Upper mid-range tier
Lower video ceiling
4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 24 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.