Mid-range · 2025

vivo Y400 Pro

Our Take
CPU capability matches upper-mid phones like Samsung Galaxy A37. Same-source Kimovil Antutu v10 AnTuTu evidence is also available. Camera shares the Samsung Galaxy A36's main sensor
Best for
Strength 90W fast charging, All-day battery (5500mAh)
Extras Cooling system, Curved display
Compare

Full specifications

Display

6.77″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2392 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth

A clean OLED panel — colours pop and sunlight visibility is solid.

Screen size
6.77"
Panel type
AMOLED
OLED
Resolution
1080 × 2392 px
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Smooth
Brightness
4500 nits
HDR
Supported

Performance

Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) · 8-core 2.5 GHz · Mali-G615 MC2
Everyday capable

Daily apps and casual games run smoothly — heavy gaming will drop frames.

Chipset
Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm)
Current CPU tier
Upper mid-range
AnTuTu
717,999
Kimovil · Antutu v10
CPU
8-core, 2.5 GHz
GPU
Mali-G615 MC2
Process
4 nm
Storage type
UFS Storage 2.2
CPU layout
4xCortex A78 2.5GHz + 4xCortex A55 2.0GHz

Software & updates

Android 15, Funtouch 15 · 2-year support (brand estimate)
Updates ending soon

How long the maker keeps shipping Android and security updates — the main thing that decides how many years this phone stays current.

Operating system
Android 15, Funtouch 15
Software support
2 years of updates (brand estimate)
Updates remaining
~1 year

Camera

50 MP f/1.8 main · 32 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
Front camera
32 MP f/2.5
Main sensor
Sony IMX882, 1/1.95", 0.8µm
Mainstream sensor
Slow motion
Yes, 240 fps
Camera extras
RAW, Night mode, manual focus
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video

Battery

5500 mAh · 90 W wired
Plenty

A genuinely all-day battery — comfortably handles streaming and social.

Capacity
5500 mAh
Wired charging
90 W
Fast
Removable
No

Audio

Stereo
Stereo speakers
Speakers
Stereo
Stereo

Memory

8 GB RAM · 128 GB
RAM
8 GB
Storage
128 GB
Configurations
8/128GB · 8/256GB
Storage type
UFS 3.1
Expandable
No

Connectivity

5G · Wi-Fi 6
5G
Yes
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
No
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 6
Modern Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
5.4
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo
USB
USB-C 2.0
USB OTG
Yes
3.5mm jack
No
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Network bands

4G works on all four carriers — 5G on MTN & Airtel

Radio bands decide whether this phone sees MTN, Glo, Airtel or 9mobile towers — and how strong the signal holds indoors.

M MTN
4G works · 5G works No B20 or B7 — weaker indoor signal, and slower speeds where the network is busy.
Works
A Airtel
4G full · 5G works
Full
G Glo
4G works No B28 — signal can get weak indoors and outside the big cities.
Works
9 9mobile
4G full
Full

The bands Nigerian networks use

B3 main band
M A G 9
B7 extra speed
M
B20 indoor reach
M
B28 indoor reach
G
n78 the 5G band
M A

The dots show which network uses each band. ✓ means this phone has it, ✗ means it doesn't.

All reported bands

2G B3, B5, B8
3G B1, B5, B8
4G B1, B3, B5, B8, B28b
5G n1, n3, n5, n8, n28b, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78

Build & Design

182 g · IP65
Built to last
Weight
182 g
IP rating
IP65
Water resistant

Sensors

Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Images and battery life estimates from GSMArena

How it stacks up against the rest.

A few phones around the same price, so you can see what this one does better and what it gives up.

vs

Apple iPhone 17

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
49% larger battery capacity
90 W vs 40 W charging · 5,500 mAh vs 3,692 mAh battery
Lower-resolution screen
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · 1080 × 2392 vs 1206 × 2622 resolution · Tradeoff: 6.77″ vs 6.3″ screen
Lower benchmark score
718k vs 2.1M AnTuTu · Upper mid-range vs Flagship tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video · 50 MP · f/1.8 vs 48 MP · f/1.6 main
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC

Same AnTuTu version, different test sources - treat this as a rough comparison.

vs

Samsung Galaxy S25

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
38% larger battery capacity
90 W vs 25 W charging · 5,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.77″ vs 6.2″ screen
Lower benchmark score
718k vs 2.2M AnTuTu · Upper mid-range vs Flagship tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · — vs Telephoto · OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC

Same AnTuTu version, different test sources - treat this as a rough comparison.

Where to buy

We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.