Mid-range · 2024
vivo Y200 Pro
Our Take
CPU capability matches mid-range phones like Samsung Galaxy A27
Best for
Strength
Stabilised camera (OIS), All-day battery (5000mAh)
Full specifications
Display
6.78″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Display
6.78″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Performance
Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 619
Everyday capable
Performance
Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 619
Everyday capable
Software & updates
Android 14, Funtouch 14 · 2-year support (brand estimate)
Likely end of life
Software & updates
Android 14, Funtouch 14 · 2-year support (brand estimate)
Likely end of life
This phone is past its update window — it still works, but new Android versions and most security patches have stopped.
Operating system
Android 14, Funtouch 14
Software support
2 years of updates (brand estimate)
Updates remaining
None — past its update window
Camera
64 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 16 MP selfie
Stabilised
Camera
64 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 16 MP selfie
Stabilised
Stabilised main camera holds up in low light. Front camera is fine for daylight selfies.
Main camera
64 MP f/1.8
OIS
Front camera
16 MP f/2.5
Video
1080p @ 30 fps
Battery
5000 mAh · 44 W wired
Plenty
Battery
5000 mAh · 44 W wired
Plenty
Connectivity
5G
Connectivity
5G
Build & Design
172 g · 7.5 mm · IP54
Build & Design
172 g · 7.5 mm · IP54
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Images and battery life estimates from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
A few phones around the same price, so you can see what this one does better and what it gives up.
vs
Apple iPhone 16
Trades blows
2 wins
2 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.78″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2400 vs 1179 × 2556 resolution
40% larger battery capacity
44 W vs 25 W charging · 5,000 mAh vs 3,561 mAh battery
Lower performance tier
Mid-range vs Flagship tier
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
25% larger battery capacity
44 W vs 25 W charging · 5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.78″ vs 6.2″ screen
Lower performance tier
Mid-range vs Flagship tier
Lower video ceiling
— vs Telephoto · OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the vivo Y200 Pro.
