Mid-range · 2022

OnePlus Nord 2T

From ₦165,000 to ₦200,000 · 5 sellers·Last checked just now

Our Take CPU benches near recent mid-range phones like the Samsung Galaxy A55

A solid mid-ranger with 80W fast charging and an AMOLED screen.

Best for Streaming · reading · social
Strength 80W fast charging, AMOLED screen

In the Real World

See how the OnePlus Nord 2T looks and feels in everyday use.

OnePlus Nord 2T hands-on photo 1
OnePlus Nord 2T hands-on photo 2
OnePlus Nord 2T hands-on photo 3
OnePlus Nord 2T hands-on photo 4
OnePlus Nord 2T hands-on photo 5
OnePlus Nord 2T hands-on photo 6
OnePlus Nord 2T hands-on photo 7
OnePlus Nord 2T hands-on photo 8
OnePlus Nord 2T hands-on photo 9

Full specifications

What stands out

Pro camera extras: Night mode

960 fps slow motion for action clips

80W charging — faster than most rivals (47W typical)

Display

6.43″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 90 Hz · HDR
OLED display

A clean OLED panel — colours pop and sunlight visibility is solid.

Screen size
6.43"
Panel type
AMOLED
OLED
Resolution
1080 × 2400 px
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Brightness
636 nits
HDR
Supported
Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 5

Performance

Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) · 8-core 3.0 GHz · Mali-G77 MC9
Everyday capable

Daily apps and casual games run smoothly — heavy gaming will drop frames.

Chipset
Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm)
Current CPU tier
Mid-range
Launch class
Upper mid-range
AnTuTu
699,576
v9
GeekBench
2,790
Graphics test
GFXBench 40 fps
CPU
8-core, 3.0 GHz
GPU
Mali-G77 MC9
Process
6 nm
RAM type
LPDDR4X RAM
Storage type
UFS Storage 3.1
CPU layout
1x Cortex A78 3GHz +3x Cortex A78 2.6GHz + 4x Cortex A55 2.0 GHz

Camera

50 MP f/1.9 main · OIS · 32 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K

Stabilised main camera holds up in low light. Front camera is fine for daylight selfies.

Main camera
50 MP f/1.9
OIS
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Front camera
32 MP f/2.4
Main sensor
Sony IMX766, 1/1.56", 1µm
Slow motion
Yes, 960 fps
Camera extras
Night mode
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video

Battery

4500 mAh · 80 W wired

Battery is average for the class — fine for daily use.

Capacity
4500 mAh
Lab endurance
100:00h
Wired charging
80 W
Fast
Removable
No

Audio

Very good (-25.6 LUFS) · Stereo
Stereo speakers
Loudspeaker
Very good (-25.6 LUFS)
Speakers
Stereo
Stereo

Memory

8 GB RAM · 128 GB
RAM
8 GB
Storage
128 GB
Storage type
UFS 3.1
Expandable
No

Connectivity

5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 6
Modern radios
5G
Yes
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
Yes
Contactless
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 6
Modern Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
5.2
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), NavIC System
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
No
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

190 g · 8.2 mm
Height
159.1 mm
Width
73.2 mm
Thickness
8.2 mm
Weight
190 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review

Independent Test Scores

Lab-tested scores from DXOMark — independent measurements, not manufacturer claims. Tap any card to view photo samples and the full review.

Scores are on DXOMark's open-ended 0–200 scale. Higher is better.

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 14

Trades blows 2 wins 2 losses
Smoother display
90 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.43″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2400 vs 1170 × 2532 resolution
37% larger battery capacity
80 W vs 15 W charging · 4,500 mAh vs 3,279 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
700k vs 1.4M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs High-end tier
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 190 g vs 172 g
vs

Samsung Galaxy S22 5G

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
22% larger battery capacity
80 W vs 25 W charging · 4,500 mAh vs 3,700 mAh battery
Less smooth display
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · 90 Hz vs 120 Hz refresh · Tradeoff: 6.43″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
700k vs 1.0M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs Upper mid-range tier
Lower video ceiling
4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 24 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 190 g vs 167 g