Mid-range · 2023
vivo T2 Pro
Our Take
CPU benches near recent mid-range phones like the Samsung Galaxy A55
A solid mid-ranger with 66W fast charging and an AMOLED screen.
Best for
Streaming · reading · social
Strength
66W fast charging, AMOLED screen
Full specifications
What stands out
Cooling hardware helps with sustained gaming performance
Display
6.78″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Display
6.78″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Performance
Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) · 8-core 2.8 GHz · Mali-G610 MC4
Everyday capable
Performance
Mediatek Dimensity 7200 (4 nm) · 8-core 2.8 GHz · Mali-G610 MC4
Everyday capable
Daily apps and casual games run smoothly — heavy gaming will drop frames.
Camera
64 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K
Camera
64 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K
Stabilised main camera holds up in low light. Front camera is fine for daylight selfies.
Main camera
64 MP f/1.8
OIS
Front camera
16 MP f/2.5
Main sensor
0.8µm
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video
Battery
4600 mAh · 66 W wired
Battery
4600 mAh · 66 W wired
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
175 g · 7.4 mm
Build & Design
175 g · 7.4 mmHeight
164.1 mm
Width
74.8 mm
Thickness
7.4 mm
Weight
175 g
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 15
Trades blows
2 wins
3 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.78″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2400 vs 1179 × 2556 resolution
37% larger battery capacity
66 W vs 15 W charging · 4,600 mAh vs 3,349 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
715k vs 1.5M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs High-end tier
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
18% larger battery capacity
66 W vs 25 W charging · 4,600 mAh vs 3,900 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.78″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
715k vs 1.8M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs High-end tier
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the vivo T2 Pro.
