Lower mid-range · 2025
Samsung Galaxy F16
Our Take
CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
A dependable lower mid-ranger with all-day battery and an AMOLED screen.
Best for
Streaming · social · long days out
Strength
All-day battery (5000mAh), AMOLED screen
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
What stands out
MIL-STD durability with IP54 water resistance
Display
6.7″ · Super AMOLED · 1080 × 2340 · 90 Hz · HDR
OLED display
Display
6.7″ · Super AMOLED · 1080 × 2340 · 90 Hz · HDR
OLED display
Performance
Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) · 8-core 2.4 GHz · Mali-G57 MC2
Basic CPU
Performance
Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) · 8-core 2.4 GHz · Mali-G57 MC2
Basic CPU
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · 13 MP selfie
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · 13 MP selfieA standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
Ultrawide
5 MP f/2.2
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
13 MP f/2.0
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Video
1080p @ 30 fps
Battery
5000 mAh · 25 W wired
All-day
Battery
5000 mAh · 25 W wired
All-day
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
191 g · 7.9 mm · IP54
Build & Design
191 g · 7.9 mm · IP54
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 17
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
35% larger battery capacity
5,000 mAh vs 3,692 mAh battery
Less smooth display
Super AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · 90 Hz vs 120 Hz refresh · 1080 × 2340 vs 1206 × 2622 resolution
Lower benchmark score
409k vs 2.2M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Flagship tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video · 13 MP vs 18 MP selfie
Heavier in hand
191 g vs 177 g
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
25% larger battery capacity
5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh battery
Less smooth display
Super AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · 90 Hz vs 120 Hz refresh · Tradeoff: 6.7″ vs 6.2″ screen
Lower benchmark score
409k vs 3.1M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Flagship tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
Heavier in hand
191 g vs 162 g
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the Samsung Galaxy F16.
Lower mid-range
Samsung Galaxy F06 5G
LCD screen · Less storage
4GB
64GB
5000mAh
Lower mid-range
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
₦135,000 – ₦185,000
LCD screen · Less storage
4GB
64GB
5000mAh
Lower mid-range
Samsung Galaxy F07
LCD screen · Less storage
4GB
64GB
5000mAh
Lower mid-range
Samsung Galaxy F17
Stabilised camera
4GB
128GB
5000mAh