Lower mid-range · 2025
Samsung Galaxy F17
Our Take
CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A15
A dependable lower mid-ranger with all-day battery and an AMOLED screen.
Best for
Streaming · social · long days out
Strength
All-day battery (5000mAh), AMOLED screen
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
What stands out
Pro camera extras: Night mode
Display
6.7″ · Super AMOLED · 1080 × 2340 · 90 Hz · HDR
OLED display
Display
6.7″ · Super AMOLED · 1080 × 2340 · 90 Hz · HDR
OLED display
Performance
Exynos 1330 (5 nm) · 8-core 2.4 GHz · Mali-G68 MP2
Basic CPU
Performance
Exynos 1330 (5 nm) · 8-core 2.4 GHz · Mali-G68 MP2
Basic CPU
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 13 MP selfie
Stabilised
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 13 MP selfie
Stabilised
Stabilised main camera holds up in low light. Front camera is fine for daylight selfies.
Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
OIS
Ultrawide
5 MP f/2.2
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
13 MP f/2.0
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Camera extras
Night mode
Video
1080p @ 30 fps
Battery
5000 mAh · 25 W wired
All-day
Battery
5000 mAh · 25 W wired
All-day
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
192 g · 7.5 mm · IP54
Build & Design
192 g · 7.5 mm · IP54
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · compass
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · compassSensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 17
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
35% larger battery capacity
5,000 mAh vs 3,692 mAh battery
Less smooth display
Super AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · 90 Hz vs 120 Hz refresh · 1080 × 2340 vs 1206 × 2622 resolution
Lower benchmark score
420k vs 2.2M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Flagship tier
Lower video ceiling
1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video · 13 MP vs 18 MP selfie
Heavier in hand
192 g vs 177 g
vs
Samsung Galaxy S25
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
25% larger battery capacity
5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh battery
Less smooth display
Super AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · 90 Hz vs 120 Hz refresh · Tradeoff: 6.7″ vs 6.2″ screen
Lower benchmark score
420k vs 3.1M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Flagship tier
Lower video ceiling
1080p @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
Heavier in hand
192 g vs 162 g
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the Samsung Galaxy F17.