Entry-level · 2022

Samsung Galaxy A13

From ₦85,000 to ₦150,000 · 4 sellers·Last checked just now

Our Take CPU benches near recent entry-level phones like the Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)

A basic entry-level phone with all-day battery — but slow 15W charging and 4G only show its age.

Best for Daily driver · WhatsApp · calls
Strength All-day battery (5000mAh)
Watch out 15W charging (slow), 4G only
Skip if Heavy gaming or multitasking

In the Real World

See how the Samsung Galaxy A13 looks and feels in everyday use.

Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 1
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 2
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 3
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 4
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 5
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 6
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 7
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 8
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 9
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 10
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 11
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 12
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 13
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 14
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 15
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 16
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 17
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 18
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 19
Samsung Galaxy A13 hands-on photo 20

Full specifications

What stands out

15W charging — slower than most at this price (25W typical)

32GB storage — half what rivals offer at this price

Display

6.6″ · TFT LCD · 1080 × 2408 · 60 Hz · HDR
Basic

A standard LCD panel. Fine indoors, watch out for sunlight legibility.

Screen size
6.6"
Panel type
TFT LCD
Resolution
1080 × 2408 px
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Slow for 2026
Brightness
587 nits
HDR
Supported
Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 5

Performance

Exynos 850 (8 nm) · 8-core 2.0 GHz · Mali-G52
Basic CPU

Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.

Chipset
Exynos 850 (8 nm)
Current CPU tier
Entry-level
Launch class
Lower mid-range
AnTuTu
200,150
v8
GeekBench
588
CPU
8-core, 2.0 GHz
GPU
Mali-G52
Process
8 nm
RAM type
LPDDR4X RAM
Storage type
eMMC 5.1 Storage
CPU layout
2x Cortex A75 2.0 GHz + 6x Cortex A55 1.8 GHz

Camera

50 MP f/1.8 main · 8 MP selfie

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
Ultrawide
5 MP f/2.2
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
8 MP f/2.2
Slow motion
No, 30 fps
Video
1080p @ 30 fps

Battery

5000 mAh · 15 W wired
All-day

A genuinely all-day battery — comfortably handles streaming and social.

Capacity
5000 mAh
Lab endurance
114:00h
Wired charging
15 W
Slow for 2026
Removable
No

Audio

Average (-29.7 LUFS)
Loudspeaker
Average (-29.7 LUFS)

Memory

3 GB RAM · 32 GB · expandable
Tight
RAM
3 GB
Tight for 2026
Storage
32 GB
Fills fast
Storage type
eMMC 5.1
Expandable
Yes

Connectivity

4G LTE · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Falls short for 2026
5G
No
4G only
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
Yes
Contactless
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.0
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
Yes
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

195 g · 8.8 mm
Height
165.1 mm
Width
76.4 mm
Thickness
8.8 mm
Weight
195 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · compass
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review

Independent Test Scores

Lab-tested scores from DXOMark — independent measurements, not manufacturer claims. Tap any card to view photo samples and the full review.

Scores are on DXOMark's open-ended 0–200 scale. Higher is better.

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 14

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
52% larger battery capacity
5,000 mAh vs 3,279 mAh battery
Lower-resolution screen
TFT LCD vs OLED panel · 1080 × 2408 vs 1170 × 2532 resolution · Tradeoff: 6.6″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
200k vs 1.4M AnTuTu · Entry-level vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video · 8 MP vs 12 MP selfie
No 5G
No 5G vs 5G
₦425k cheaper Full comparison
vs

Samsung Galaxy S22 5G

Loses on most 5 losses
Less smooth display
TFT LCD vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · 60 Hz vs 120 Hz refresh · Tradeoff: 6.6″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
200k vs 1.0M AnTuTu · Entry-level vs Upper mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 24 fps video
No 5G
No 5G vs 5G
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 195 g vs 167 g
₦165k cheaper Full comparison