Mid-range · 2022

Oppo Reno8 Pro

From ₦260,000 to ₦290,000 · 8 sellers·Last checked just now

Our Take CPU benches near recent mid-range phones like the Google Pixel 6a

A solid mid-ranger with 80W fast charging and an AMOLED screen.

Best for Streaming · reading · social
Strength 80W fast charging, AMOLED screen

In the Real World

See how the Oppo Reno8 Pro looks and feels in everyday use.

Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 1
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 2
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 3
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 4
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 5
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 6
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 7
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 8
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 9
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 10
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 11
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 12
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 13
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 14
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 15
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 16
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 17
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 18
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 19
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 20
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 21
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 22
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 23
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 24
Oppo Reno8 Pro hands-on photo 25

Full specifications

What stands out

Pro camera extras: Night mode

240 fps slow motion for action clips

256GB storage — double what most rivals ship

Display

6.7″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2412 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth

A clean OLED panel — colours pop and sunlight visibility is solid.

Screen size
6.7"
Panel type
AMOLED
OLED
Resolution
1080 × 2412 px
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Smooth
Brightness
818 nits
HDR
Supported
Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 5

Performance

Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm) · 8-core 2.85 GHz · Mali-G610 MC6
Everyday capable

Daily apps and casual games run smoothly — heavy gaming will drop frames.

Chipset
Mediatek Dimensity 8100 Max (5 nm)
Current CPU tier
Mid-range
AnTuTu
837,000
v10
GeekBench
3,395
Graphics test
GFXBench 44 fps
CPU
8-core, 2.85 GHz
GPU
Mali-G610 MC6
Process
5 nm
RAM type
RAM LPDDR5
Storage type
UFS Storage 3.1
CPU layout
4x Cortex A78 2.85 GHz + 4x Cortex A55 2.0 GHz

Camera

50 MP f/1.8 main · 32 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
32 MP f/2.4
Main sensor
Sony IMX766, 1/1.56", 1µm
Slow motion
Yes, 240 fps
Camera extras
Night mode
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video

Battery

4500 mAh · 80 W wired

Battery is average for the class — fine for daily use.

Capacity
4500 mAh
Lab endurance
100:00h
Wired charging
80 W
Fast
Removable
No

Audio

Very good (-25.5 LUFS) · Stereo
Stereo speakers
Loudspeaker
Very good (-25.5 LUFS)
Speakers
Stereo
Stereo

Memory

8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Roomy
RAM
8 GB
Storage
256 GB
Storage type
UFS 3.1
Expandable
No

Connectivity

5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 6
Modern radios
5G
Yes
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
Yes
Contactless
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 6
Modern Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
5.3
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), BeiDou (B1), Galileo (E1+E5a), BeiDou (B2)
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
No
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

183 g · 7.3 mm
Height
161.2 mm
Width
74.2 mm
Thickness
7.3 mm
Weight
183 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 14

Trades blows 2 wins 3 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.7″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2412 vs 1170 × 2532 resolution
37% larger battery capacity
80 W vs 15 W charging · 4,500 mAh vs 3,279 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
837k vs 1.4M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 183 g vs 172 g
vs

Samsung Galaxy S22 5G

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
22% larger battery capacity
80 W vs 25 W charging · 4,500 mAh vs 3,700 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.7″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
837k vs 1.0M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs Upper mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 24 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 183 g vs 167 g