Lower mid-range · 2020

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G

Our Take CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A05s

A dependable lower mid-ranger with a 120Hz display — but a smaller battery and slow 18W charging show its age.

Strength 120Hz smooth scrolling
Watch out Smaller battery (4000mAh), 18W charging (slow)
Skip if Heavy gaming or multitasking
Compare

In the Real World

See how the Oppo Reno4 Z 5G looks and feels in everyday use.

Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 1
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 2
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 3
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 4
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 5
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 6
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 7
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 8
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 9
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 10
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 11
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 12
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 13
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 14
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 15
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 16
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 17
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 18
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 19
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 20
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 21
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 22
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 23
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 24
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 25
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 26
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 27
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 28
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 29
Oppo Reno4 Z 5G hands-on photo 30

Full specifications

What stands out

Pro camera extras: Night mode

Display

6.57″ · IPS LCD · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
Smooth scrolling

A standard LCD panel. Fine indoors, watch out for sunlight legibility.

Screen size
6.57"
Panel type
IPS LCD
Resolution
1080 × 2400 px
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Smooth
Brightness
398 nits
HDR
Supported
Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3+

Performance

Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm) · 8-core 2.0 GHz · Mali-G57 MC4
Basic CPU

Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.

Chipset
Mediatek Dimensity 800 (7 nm)
Current CPU tier
Lower mid-range
Launch class
Mid-range
AnTuTu
325,776
v8
GeekBench
2,196
Graphics test
GFXBench 16 fps
CPU
8-core, 2.0 GHz
GPU
Mali-G57 MC4
Process
7 nm
RAM type
LPDDR4X RAM
Storage type
UFS Storage 2.1
CPU layout
4x Cortex A76 2.0 GHz + 4x Cortex A55 2.0 GHz

Camera

48 MP f/1.7 main · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
48 MP f/1.7
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Front camera
16 MP f/2.0
Main sensor
Sony IMX586 Exmor RS, 1/2", 0.8µm
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Camera extras
Night mode
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video

Battery

4000 mAh · 18 W wired

Battery is average for the class — fine for daily use.

Capacity
4000 mAh
Lab endurance
78:00h
Wired charging
18 W
Slow for 2026
Removable
No

Audio

Average (-28.1 LUFS)
Loudspeaker
Average (-28.1 LUFS)

Memory

8 GB RAM · 128 GB
RAM
8 GB
Storage
128 GB
Storage type
UFS 2.1
Expandable
No

Connectivity

5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
5G
Yes
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
Yes
Contactless
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.1
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
Yes
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

184 g · 8.1 mm
Height
163.8 mm
Width
75.5 mm
Thickness
8.1 mm
Weight
184 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 12

Trades blows 2 wins 3 losses
42% larger battery capacity
4,000 mAh vs 2,815 mAh battery
Starts with more storage
128 GB vs 64 GB baseline
Lower benchmark score
326k vs 1.3M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 184 g vs 164 g
vs

Samsung Galaxy S20

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
5G connectivity
5G vs no 5G
Lower-resolution screen
IPS LCD vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · 1080 × 2400 vs 1440 × 3200 resolution · Tradeoff: 6.57″ vs 6.2″ screen
Lower benchmark score
326k vs 623k AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 24 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 184 g vs 163 g

Where to buy

We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.