Lower mid-range · 2020

Oppo Reno4 Pro

Our Take CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A05s

A dependable lower mid-ranger with 65W fast charging and an AMOLED screen — but a smaller battery shows its age.

Best for Streaming · reading · social
Strength 65W fast charging, AMOLED screen
Watch out Smaller battery (4000mAh)
Skip if Heavy gaming or multitasking
Compare

In the Real World

See how the Oppo Reno4 Pro looks and feels in everyday use.

Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 1
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 2
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 3
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 4
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 5
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 6
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 7
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 8
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 9
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 10
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 11
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 12
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 13
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 14
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 15
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 16
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 17
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 18
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 19
Oppo Reno4 Pro hands-on photo 20

Full specifications

What stands out

Dolby Atmos for higher-quality listening

Pro camera extras: optical zoom

240 fps slow motion for action clips

Display

6.5″ · Super AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 90 Hz · HDR
OLED display

A clean OLED panel — colours pop and sunlight visibility is solid.

Screen size
6.5"
Panel type
Super AMOLED
OLED
Resolution
1080 × 2400 px
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Brightness
843 nits
HDR
Supported
Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 5

Performance

Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) · 8-core 2.3 GHz · Adreno 618
Basic CPU

Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.

Chipset
Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm)
Current CPU tier
Lower mid-range
Launch class
Mid-range
AnTuTu
325,000
v8
GeekBench
1,781
Graphics test
GFXBench 15 fps
CPU
8-core, 2.3 GHz
GPU
Adreno 618
Process
8 nm
RAM type
LPDDR4X RAM
Storage type
UFS Storage 2.1
CPU layout
1x Cortex A76 2.4 GHz + 1x Cortex A76 2.2 GHz + 6x Cortex A76 1.8 GHz

Camera

48 MP f/1.7 main · 32 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
48 MP f/1.7
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
32 MP f/2.4
Main sensor
Sony IMX586 Exmor RS, 1/2", 0.8µm
Slow motion
Yes, 240 fps
Camera extras
optical zoom
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video

Battery

4000 mAh · 65 W wired

Battery is average for the class — fine for daily use.

Capacity
4000 mAh
Lab endurance
96:00h
Wired charging
65 W
Fast
Removable
No

Audio

Average (-28.8 LUFS) · Stereo · Dolby Atmos
Stereo speakers
Loudspeaker
Average (-28.8 LUFS)
Speakers
Stereo
Stereo
Dolby Atmos
Supported
Audio features
Dolby Atmos

Memory

8 GB RAM · 128 GB · expandable
RAM
8 GB
Storage
128 GB
Storage type
UFS 2.1
Expandable
Yes

Connectivity

4G LTE · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
5G
No
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
Yes
Contactless
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.1
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), Galileo (E1+E5a)
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
Yes
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

161 g · 7.7 mm
Height
160.2 mm
Width
73.2 mm
Thickness
7.7 mm
Weight
161 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review

Independent Test Scores

Lab-tested scores from DXOMark — independent measurements, not manufacturer claims. Tap any card to view photo samples and the full review.

Scores are on DXOMark's open-ended 0–200 scale. Higher is better.

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 12

Trades blows 2 wins 3 losses
Smoother display
Super AMOLED vs OLED panel · 90 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.5″ vs 6.1″ screen
42% larger battery capacity
65 W vs 15 W charging · 4,000 mAh vs 2,815 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
325k vs 1.3M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No 5G
No 5G vs 5G
vs

Samsung Galaxy S20

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
Faster charging
65 W vs 25 W charging
Less smooth display
Super AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · 90 Hz vs 120 Hz refresh · 1080 × 2400 vs 1440 × 3200 resolution
Lower benchmark score
325k vs 623k AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 24 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection

Where to buy

We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.