Mid-range · 2023

Oppo Reno10 Pro

From ₦285,000 to ₦335,000 · 4 sellers·Last checked just now

Our Take CPU benches near recent mid-range phones like the Samsung Galaxy A35

A solid mid-ranger with 80W fast charging and an AMOLED screen.

Best for Streaming · reading · social
Strength 80W fast charging, AMOLED screen

In the Real World

See how the Oppo Reno10 Pro looks and feels in everyday use.

Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 1
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 2
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 3
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 4
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 5
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 6
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 7
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 8
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 9
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 10
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 11
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 12
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 13
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 14
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 15
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 16
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 17
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 18
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 19
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 20
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 21
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 22
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 23
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 24
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 25
Oppo Reno10 Pro hands-on photo 26

Full specifications

What stands out

Pro camera extras: optical zoom, RAW

240 fps slow motion for action clips

Stabilised camera (OIS) — uncommon at this price

Display

6.7″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2412 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth

A clean OLED panel — colours pop and sunlight visibility is solid.

Screen size
6.7"
Panel type
AMOLED
OLED
Resolution
1080 × 2412 px
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Smooth
Brightness
793 nits
HDR
Supported
Protection
Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2

Performance

Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) · 8-core 2.4 GHz · Adreno 642L
Everyday capable

Daily apps and casual games run smoothly — heavy gaming will drop frames.

Chipset
Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm)
Current CPU tier
Mid-range
AnTuTu
601,345
v10
GeekBench
2,685
Graphics test
GFXBench 29 fps
CPU
8-core, 2.4 GHz
GPU
Adreno 642L
Process
6 nm
RAM type
LPDDR4X RAM
Storage type
UFS Storage 2.2
CPU layout
1×Cortex A78 2.4GHz + 3×Cortex A78 2.2GHz+ 4xCortex A55 1.9 GHz

Camera

50 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 32 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K

Stabilised main camera holds up in low light. Front camera is fine for daylight selfies.

Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
OIS
Telephoto
32 MP f/2.0
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Front camera
32 MP f/2.4
Main sensor
Sony IMX890, 1/1.56", 1µm
Slow motion
Yes, 240 fps
Camera extras
optical zoom, RAW
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video

Battery

4600 mAh · 80 W wired

Battery is average for the class — fine for daily use.

Capacity
4600 mAh
Lab active use
11:05h
Lab endurance
11:05h
Wired charging
80 W
Fast
Removable
No

Audio

Average (-28.6 LUFS)
Loudspeaker
Average (-28.6 LUFS)

Memory

8 GB RAM · 256 GB
Roomy
RAM
8 GB
Storage
256 GB
Storage type
UFS 2.2
Expandable
No

Connectivity

5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 6
Modern radios
5G
Yes
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
Yes
Contactless
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 6
Modern Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
5.2
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
No
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

185 g · 7.9 mm
Height
162.3 mm
Width
74.2 mm
Thickness
7.9 mm
Weight
185 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 15

Trades blows 2 wins 3 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.7″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2412 vs 1179 × 2556 resolution
Starts with more storage
256 GB vs 128 GB baseline
Lower benchmark score
601k vs 1.5M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs High-end tier
Lower video ceiling
4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 185 g vs 171 g
₦395k cheaper Full comparison
vs

Samsung Galaxy S23

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
18% larger battery capacity
80 W vs 25 W charging · 4,600 mAh vs 3,900 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.7″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
601k vs 1.8M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs High-end tier
Lower video ceiling
4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 185 g vs 168 g
₦75k cheaper Full comparison