Mid-range · 2023

Oppo Reno10

From ₦260,000 to ₦450,000 · 6 sellers·Last checked just now

Our Take CPU benches near recent mid-range phones like the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G

A solid mid-ranger with all-day battery and 67W fast charging.

Best for Streaming · social · long days out
Strength All-day battery (5000mAh), 67W fast charging

In the Real World

See how the Oppo Reno10 looks and feels in everyday use.

Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 1
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 2
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 3
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 4
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 5
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 6
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 7
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 8
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 9
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 10
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 11
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 12
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 13
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 14
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 15
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 16
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 17
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 18
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 19
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 20
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 21
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 22
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 23
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 24
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 25
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 26
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 27
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 28
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 29
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 30
Oppo Reno10 hands-on photo 31

Full specifications

What stands out

Pro camera extras: optical zoom, RAW

240 fps slow motion for action clips

Display

6.7″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2412 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth

A clean OLED panel — colours pop and sunlight visibility is solid.

Screen size
6.7"
Panel type
AMOLED
OLED
Resolution
1080 × 2412 px
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Smooth
Brightness
811 nits
HDR
Supported
Protection
Asahi Glass AGC DT-Star2

Performance

Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) · 8-core 2.6 GHz · Mali-G68 MC4
Everyday capable

Daily apps and casual games run smoothly — heavy gaming will drop frames.

Chipset
Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
Current CPU tier
Mid-range
AnTuTu
566,125
GeekBench
2,403
Graphics test
GFXBench 21 fps
CPU
8-core, 2.6 GHz
GPU
Mali-G68 MC4
Process
6 nm
RAM type
LPDDR4X RAM
Storage type
UFS Storage 2.2
CPU layout
2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex A78+6x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex A55

Camera

64 MP f/1.7 main · 32 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
64 MP f/1.7
Telephoto
32 MP f/2.0
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Front camera
32 MP f/2.4
Main sensor
Omnivision OV64B, 1/2", 0.7µm
Slow motion
Yes, 240 fps
Camera extras
optical zoom, RAW
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video

Battery

5000 mAh · 67 W wired
Plenty

A genuinely all-day battery — comfortably handles streaming and social.

Capacity
5000 mAh
Lab endurance
116:00h
Wired charging
67 W
Fast
Removable
No

Audio

Very good (-24.9 LUFS)
Loudspeaker
Very good (-24.9 LUFS)

Memory

8 GB RAM · 128 GB · expandable
RAM
8 GB
Storage
128 GB
Storage type
UFS 2.2
Expandable
Yes

Connectivity

5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 6
Modern radios
5G
Yes
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
Yes
Contactless
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 6
Modern Wi-Fi
Bluetooth
5.3
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
No
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

185 g · 8.0 mm
Height
162.4 mm
Width
74.2 mm
Thickness
8.0 mm
Weight
185 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 15

Trades blows 2 wins 3 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.7″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2412 vs 1179 × 2556 resolution
49% larger battery capacity
67 W vs 15 W charging · 5,000 mAh vs 3,349 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
566k vs 1.5M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 185 g vs 171 g
vs

Samsung Galaxy S23

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
28% larger battery capacity
67 W vs 25 W charging · 5,000 mAh vs 3,900 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.7″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
566k vs 1.8M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 185 g vs 168 g