Mid-range · 2023

ZTE Blade V50

Our Take CPU benches near recent mid-range phones like the Samsung Galaxy A36

A solid mid-ranger with an AMOLED screen and a 120Hz display.

Best for Streaming · reading · social
Strength AMOLED screen, 120Hz smooth scrolling
Compare

Full specifications

Display

6.67″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth

A clean OLED panel — colours pop and sunlight visibility is solid.

Screen size
6.67"
Panel type
AMOLED
OLED
Resolution
1080 × 2400 px
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Smooth
HDR
Supported

Performance

Unknown
Everyday capable

Daily apps and casual games run smoothly — heavy gaming will drop frames.

Chipset
Unknown
Current CPU tier
Mid-range
AnTuTu
641,019
v11
RAM type
LPDDR4X RAM
CPU layout
4x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex A76 +4x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex A55

Camera

50 MP f/1.8 main · 16 MP selfie

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
16 MP f/2.0
Slow motion
No, 30 fps
Video
1080p @ 30 fps

Battery

4800 mAh · 33 W wired

Battery is average for the class — fine for daily use.

Capacity
4800 mAh
Wired charging
33 W
Removable
No

Memory

6 GB RAM · 256 GB
RAM
6 GB
Storage
256 GB
Expandable
No

Connectivity

5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
5G
Yes
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
Yes
Contactless
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.2
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
No
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

178 g · 8.0 mm
Height
161.9 mm
Width
72.8 mm
Thickness
8.0 mm
Weight
178 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 15

Trades blows 2 wins 3 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.67″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2400 vs 1179 × 2556 resolution
43% larger battery capacity
33 W vs 15 W charging · 4,800 mAh vs 3,349 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
641k vs 1.5M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection
vs

Samsung Galaxy S23

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
23% larger battery capacity
4,800 mAh vs 3,900 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.67″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
641k vs 1.8M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 178 g vs 168 g

Where to buy

We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.