Lower mid-range · 2023

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12

Our Take CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G

A dependable lower mid-ranger with all-day battery and an AMOLED screen.

Best for Streaming · social · long days out
Strength All-day battery (5000mAh), AMOLED screen
Skip if Heavy gaming or multitasking
Compare

In the Real World

See how the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 looks and feels in everyday use.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 1
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 2
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 4
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 5
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 6
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 7
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 8
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 9
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 10
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 11
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 12
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 13
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 14
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 hands-on photo 15

Full specifications

What stands out

Pro camera extras: RAW, Night mode, manual focus

Cooling hardware helps with sustained gaming performance

Display

6.67″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth

A clean OLED panel — colours pop and sunlight visibility is solid.

Screen size
6.67"
Panel type
AMOLED
OLED
Resolution
1080 × 2400 px
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Smooth
Brightness
706 nits
HDR
Supported
Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass 3

Performance

Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) · 8-core 2.0 GHz · Adreno 619
Basic CPU

Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.

Chipset
Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm)
Current CPU tier
Lower mid-range
AnTuTu
460,800
v10
GeekBench
2,017
CPU
8-core, 2.0 GHz
GPU
Adreno 619
Process
6 nm
RAM type
LPDDR4X RAM
Storage type
UFS Storage 2.2
CPU layout
2x2.0 GHz Cortex A78 + 6x1.8 GHz Cortex A55

Camera

48 MP f/1.8 main · 13 MP selfie

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
48 MP f/1.8
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
13 MP f/2.5
Main sensor
Samsung S5KJN1 (48MP), 1/2.76", 0.64µm
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Camera extras
RAW, Night mode, manual focus
Video
1080p @ 30 fps

Battery

5000 mAh · 33 W wired
Plenty

A genuinely all-day battery — comfortably handles streaming and social.

Capacity
5000 mAh
Lab active use
10:58h
Lab endurance
10:58h
Wired charging
33 W
Removable
No

Audio

Good (-28.0 LUFS)
Loudspeaker
Good (-28.0 LUFS)

Memory

4 GB RAM · 128 GB · expandable
Tight
RAM
4 GB
Tight for 2026
Storage
128 GB
Storage type
UFS 2.2
Expandable
Yes

Connectivity

5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
5G
Yes
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
Yes
Contactless
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.1
GPS systems
A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BeiDou (B1)
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
Yes
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

188 g · 8.0 mm · IP53
Height
165.9 mm
Width
76.2 mm
Thickness
8.0 mm
Weight
188 g
IP rating
IP53

Sensors

Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review

Independent Test Scores

Lab-tested scores from DXOMark — independent measurements, not manufacturer claims. Tap any card to view photo samples and the full review.

Scores are on DXOMark's open-ended 0–200 scale. Higher is better.

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 15

Loses on most 1 win 3 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.67″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2400 vs 1179 × 2556 resolution
Lower benchmark score
461k vs 1.5M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Heavier in hand
188 g vs 171 g
vs

Samsung Galaxy S23

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
28% larger battery capacity
5,000 mAh vs 3,900 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.67″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
461k vs 1.8M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
Heavier in hand
188 g vs 168 g

Where to buy

We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.