Entry-level · 2019
Xiaomi Mi CC9e
Our Take
CPU benches near recent entry-level phones like the Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)
A basic entry-level phone with an AMOLED screen — but a smaller battery and slow 18W charging show its age.
Best for
Streaming · reading · social
Strength
AMOLED screen
Watch out
Smaller battery (4030mAh), 18W charging (slow)
Skip if
You watch a lot of video or play demanding games
Full specifications
What stands out
480 fps slow motion for action clips
Display
6.01″ · Super AMOLED · 720 × 1560 · 60 Hz · HDR
OLED display
Display
6.01″ · Super AMOLED · 720 × 1560 · 60 Hz · HDR
OLED display
Performance
Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) · 8-core 2.0 GHz · Adreno 610
Basic CPU
Performance
Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) · 8-core 2.0 GHz · Adreno 610
Basic CPU
Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.
Camera
48 MP f/1.8 main · 32 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
Camera
48 MP f/1.8 main · 32 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
48 MP f/1.8
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Front camera
32 MP f/2.0
Main sensor
Sony IMX582 Exmor RS, 1/2.96", 0.6µm
Slow motion
Yes, 480 fps
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video
Battery
4030 mAh · 18 W wired
Battery
4030 mAh · 18 W wired
Memory
4 GB RAM · 64 GB · expandable
Tight
Memory
4 GB RAM · 64 GB · expandable
Tight
Connectivity
4G LTE · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
4G LTE · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
8 g · 8.5 mm
Build & Design
8 g · 8.5 mmHeight
153.5 mm
Width
71.9 mm
Thickness
8.5 mm
Weight
8 g
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 11
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
30% larger battery capacity
4,030 mAh vs 3,110 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
178k vs 816k AnTuTu · Entry-level vs Mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection
vs
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
30% larger battery capacity
4,030 mAh vs 3,100 mAh battery
Lower-resolution screen
Super AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · 720 × 1560 vs 1080 × 2280 resolution
Lower benchmark score
178k vs 390k AnTuTu · Entry-level vs Lower mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the Xiaomi Mi CC9e.