Lower mid-range · 2018
Xiaomi Black Shark
Our Take
CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G
A dependable lower mid-ranger — watch out for a smaller battery and slow 18W charging.
Watch out
Smaller battery (4000mAh), 18W charging (slow)
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
What stands out
Cooling hardware helps with sustained gaming performance
Display
5.99″ · IPS LCD · 1080 × 2160 · 60 Hz · HDR
Basic
Display
5.99″ · IPS LCD · 1080 × 2160 · 60 Hz · HDR
Basic
Performance
Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) · 8-core 2.8 GHz · Adreno 630
Basic CPU
Performance
Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) · 8-core 2.8 GHz · Adreno 630
Basic CPU
Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.
Camera
12 MP f/1.8 main · 20 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
Camera
12 MP f/1.8 main · 20 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
12 MP f/1.8
Telephoto
20 MP f/1.8
Front camera
20 MP f/2.2
Main sensor
1.25µm
Slow motion
No, 30 fps
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video
Battery
4000 mAh · 18 W wired
Battery
4000 mAh · 18 W wired
Connectivity
4G LTE · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
4G LTE · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
190 g · 9.3 mm
Build & Design
190 g · 9.3 mmHeight
161.6 mm
Width
75.4 mm
Thickness
9.3 mm
Weight
190 g
Sensors
Fingerprint (front-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (front-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone XS
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
50% larger battery capacity
4,000 mAh vs 2,658 mAh battery
Lower-resolution screen
IPS LCD vs OLED panel · 1080 × 2160 vs 1125 × 2436 resolution
Lower benchmark score
433k vs 691k AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
vs
Samsung Galaxy S9
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
33% larger battery capacity
4,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh battery
Lower-resolution screen
IPS LCD vs Super AMOLED panel · 1080 × 2160 vs 1440 × 2960 resolution
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 190 g vs 163 g
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the Xiaomi Black Shark.
Lower mid-range
Xiaomi Black Shark Helo
AMOLED screen · More storage
6GB
128GB
4000mAh
Lower mid-range
Xiaomi Pocophone F1
6GB
64GB
4000mAh
Lower mid-range
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2S
Smaller battery · NFC included
6GB
64GB
3400mAh
Lower mid-range
Xiaomi Redmi K20 Pro Premium
Newer (2019) · AMOLED screen
8GB
128GB
4000mAh