Mid-range · 2024
vivo Y300 Pro
Our Take
CPU benches near recent mid-range phones like the Samsung Galaxy A54
A solid mid-ranger with all-day battery and 80W fast charging.
Best for
Streaming · social · long days out
Strength
All-day battery (6500mAh), 80W fast charging
Full specifications
What stands out
Reverse charging for accessories and earbuds
Cooling hardware helps with sustained gaming performance
Display
6.77″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2392 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Display
6.77″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2392 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Performance
Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 710
Everyday capable
Performance
Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 710
Everyday capable
Daily apps and casual games run smoothly — heavy gaming will drop frames.
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · 32 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · 32 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
Front camera
32 MP f/2.0
Main sensor
Sony LYT-600, 1/1.95", 0.7µm
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video
Battery
6500 mAh · 80 W wired
Plenty
Battery
6500 mAh · 80 W wired
Plenty
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 6
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 6
Build & Design
194 g · 7.7 mm · IP65
Built to last
Build & Design
194 g · 7.7 mm · IP65
Built to last
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 16
Trades blows
2 wins
3 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.77″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2392 vs 1179 × 2556 resolution
83% larger battery capacity
80 W vs 25 W charging · 6,500 mAh vs 3,561 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
575k vs 1.9M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs Flagship tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
63% larger battery capacity
80 W vs 25 W charging · 6,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.77″ vs 6.2″ screen
Lower benchmark score
575k vs 1.9M AnTuTu · Mid-range vs Flagship tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the vivo Y300 Pro.