Lower mid-range · 2024
vivo Y300
Our Take
CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
A dependable lower mid-ranger with all-day battery and 80W fast charging.
Best for
Streaming · social · long days out
Strength
All-day battery (5000mAh), 80W fast charging
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
What stands out
Hi-Res audio for higher-quality listening
Display
6.67″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Display
6.67″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Performance
Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 613
Basic CPU
Performance
Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 613
Basic CPU
Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · 32 MP selfie
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · 32 MP selfieA standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
Front camera
32 MP f/2.5
Main sensor
Sony IMX882, 1/1.95", 0.8µm
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Video
1080p @ 30 fps
Battery
5000 mAh · 80 W wired
Plenty
Battery
5000 mAh · 80 W wired
Plenty
Audio
Stereo · Hi-Res
Stereo speakers
Audio
Stereo · Hi-Res
Stereo speakers
Speakers
Stereo
Stereo
Hi-Res audio
Supported
Audio features
Hi-Res audio
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
188 g · 7.8 mm · IP64
Built to last
Build & Design
188 g · 7.8 mm · IP64
Built to last
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 16
Trades blows
2 wins
3 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.67″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2400 vs 1179 × 2556 resolution
40% larger battery capacity
80 W vs 25 W charging · 5,000 mAh vs 3,561 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
457k vs 1.9M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Flagship tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
vs
Samsung Galaxy S24
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
25% larger battery capacity
80 W vs 25 W charging · 5,000 mAh vs 4,000 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.67″ vs 6.2″ screen
Lower benchmark score
457k vs 1.9M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Flagship tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the vivo Y300.
