Lower mid-range · 2023
vivo Y200
Our Take
CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A17 4G
A dependable lower mid-ranger with an AMOLED screen and a 120Hz display.
Best for
Streaming · reading · social
Strength
AMOLED screen, 120Hz smooth scrolling
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
What stands out
Cooling hardware helps with sustained gaming performance
Display
6.67″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Display
6.67″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Performance
Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) · 8-core 2.0 GHz · Adreno 619
Basic CPU
Performance
Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) · 8-core 2.0 GHz · Adreno 619
Basic CPU
Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.
Camera
64 MP f/1.8 main · 16 MP selfie
Camera
64 MP f/1.8 main · 16 MP selfieA standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
64 MP f/1.8
Front camera
16 MP f/2.0
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Video
1080p @ 30 fps
Battery
4800 mAh · 44 W wired
Battery
4800 mAh · 44 W wired
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
190 g · 7.7 mm · IP54
Build & Design
190 g · 7.7 mm · IP54
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 15
Trades blows
2 wins
3 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.67″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2400 vs 1179 × 2556 resolution
43% larger battery capacity
44 W vs 15 W charging · 4,800 mAh vs 3,349 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
461k vs 1.5M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
23% larger battery capacity
44 W vs 25 W charging · 4,800 mAh vs 3,900 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.67″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
461k vs 1.8M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the vivo Y200.
