Entry-level · 2017

vivo X9s

Our Take CPU benches near recent entry-level phones like the Samsung Galaxy F13

A basic entry-level phone with an AMOLED screen — but a smaller battery and slow 10W charging show its age.

Best for Streaming · reading · social
Strength AMOLED screen
Watch out Smaller battery (3320mAh), 10W charging (slow)
Skip if Heavy gaming or multitasking
Compare

Full specifications

Display

5.5″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 1920 · 60 Hz
OLED display

A clean OLED panel — colours pop and sunlight visibility is solid.

Screen size
5.5"
Panel type
AMOLED
OLED
Resolution
1080 × 1920 px
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Slow for 2026
HDR
Not listed

Performance

Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 (28 nm) · 8-core 1.8 GHz · Adreno 510
Basic CPU

Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.

Chipset
Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 (28 nm)
Current CPU tier
Entry-level
Launch class
Upper mid-range
AnTuTu
102,096
v7
CPU
8-core, 1.8 GHz
GPU
Adreno 510
Process
28 nm
CPU layout
4x Cortex A72 1.8 GHz + 4x Cortex A53 1.2 GHz

Camera

16 MP main · 20 MP selfie

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
16 MP
Front camera
20 MP f/2.0
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Video
1080p @ 30 fps

Battery

3320 mAh · 10 W wired
Plan to charge daily

Small by today's standards. Plan on charging once a day, twice if you're heavy.

Capacity
3320 mAh
Wired charging
10 W
Slow for 2026
Removable
No

Memory

4 GB RAM · 64 GB
Tight
RAM
4 GB
Tight for 2026
Storage
64 GB
Fills fast
Storage type
eMMC 5.1
Expandable
No

Connectivity

4G LTE · Wi-Fi 5
5G
No
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
No
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
4.2
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS
USB
Micro-USB
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
Yes
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

154 g · 7.0 mm
Height
152.6 mm
Width
74.0 mm
Thickness
7.0 mm
Weight
154 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (front-mounted) · accelerometer · proximity · compass
Sensors
Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone X

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
22% larger battery capacity
3,320 mAh vs 2,716 mAh battery
Lower-resolution screen
1080 × 1920 vs 1125 × 2436 resolution
Lower benchmark score
102k vs 598k AnTuTu · Entry-level vs Mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
vs

Samsung Galaxy S8

Loses on most 5 losses
Lower-resolution screen
AMOLED vs Super AMOLED panel · 1080 × 1920 vs 1440 × 2960 resolution
Lower benchmark score
102k vs 202k AnTuTu
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 30 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection

Where to buy

We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.