Entry-level · 2016
vivo X9 Plus
Our Take
CPU benches near recent entry-level phones like the Samsung Galaxy A04e
A basic entry-level phone — watch out for a smaller battery and slow 18W charging.
Watch out
Smaller battery (4000mAh), 18W charging (slow)
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
Display
5.88″ · IPS LCD · 1080 × 1920 · 60 Hz · HDR
Basic
Display
5.88″ · IPS LCD · 1080 × 1920 · 60 Hz · HDR
Basic
Performance
Qualcomm MSM8976 Pro Snapdragon 653 (28 nm) · 8-core 1.95 GHz · Adreno 510
Basic CPU
Performance
Qualcomm MSM8976 Pro Snapdragon 653 (28 nm) · 8-core 1.95 GHz · Adreno 510
Basic CPU
Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.
Camera
16 MP f/2.0 main · 20 MP selfie
Camera
16 MP f/2.0 main · 20 MP selfieA standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
16 MP f/2.0
Front camera
20 MP f/2.0
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Video
1080p @ 30 fps
Battery
4000 mAh · 18 W wired
Battery
4000 mAh · 18 W wired
Connectivity
4G LTE · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
4G LTE · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
199 g · 7.5 mm
Build & Design
199 g · 7.5 mmHeight
162.0 mm
Width
79.0 mm
Thickness
7.5 mm
Weight
199 g
Sensors
Fingerprint (front-mounted) · accelerometer · proximity · compass
Sensors
Fingerprint (front-mounted) · accelerometer · proximity · compassSensors
Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 7
Trades blows
2 wins
3 losses
Sharper screen
1080 × 1920 vs 750 × 1334 resolution · 5.88″ vs 4.7″ screen
104% larger battery capacity
4,000 mAh vs 1,960 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
105k vs 238k AnTuTu
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 30 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
vs
Samsung Galaxy S7
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
33% larger battery capacity
4,000 mAh vs 3,000 mAh battery
Lower-resolution screen
IPS LCD vs Super AMOLED panel · 1080 × 1920 vs 1440 × 2560 resolution · Tradeoff: 5.88″ vs 5.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
105k vs 189k AnTuTu
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 30 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the vivo X9 Plus.