Lower mid-range · 2022
vivo T2 (China)
Our Take
CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
A dependable lower mid-ranger with 80W fast charging and an AMOLED screen.
Best for
Streaming · reading · social
Strength
80W fast charging, AMOLED screen
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
What stands out
Pro camera extras: RAW
Display
6.62″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Display
6.62″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Performance
Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) · 8-core 3.2 GHz · Adreno 650
Basic CPU
Performance
Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) · 8-core 3.2 GHz · Adreno 650
Basic CPU
Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.
Camera
64 MP f/1.9 main · OIS · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K
Camera
64 MP f/1.9 main · OIS · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K
Stabilised main camera holds up in low light. Front camera is fine for daylight selfies.
Main camera
64 MP f/1.9
OIS
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
16 MP f/2.0
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Camera extras
RAW
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video
Battery
4700 mAh · 80 W wired
Battery
4700 mAh · 80 W wired
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
190 g · 8.5 mm
Build & Design
190 g · 8.5 mmHeight
163.0 mm
Width
76.2 mm
Thickness
8.5 mm
Weight
190 g
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 14
Trades blows
2 wins
2 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.62″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2400 vs 1170 × 2532 resolution
43% larger battery capacity
80 W vs 15 W charging · 4,700 mAh vs 3,279 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
402k vs 1.4M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 190 g vs 172 g
vs
Samsung Galaxy S22 5G
Loses on most
1 win
3 losses
27% larger battery capacity
80 W vs 25 W charging · 4,700 mAh vs 3,700 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.62″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
402k vs 1.0M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Upper mid-range tier
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 190 g vs 167 g
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the vivo T2 (China).
