Upper mid-range · 2023

Tecno Phantom X2 Pro

Our Take CPU benches near recent upper-mid phones like the Google Pixel 8 Pro

A well-rounded upper mid-ranger with all-day battery and an AMOLED screen.

Best for Gaming · streaming · camera work
Strength All-day battery (5160mAh), AMOLED screen
Compare

In the Real World

See how the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro looks and feels in everyday use.

Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 1
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 2
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 3
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 4
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 5
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 6
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 7
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 8
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 9
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 10
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 11
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 12
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 13
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 14
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 15
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 16
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 17
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 18
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 19
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 20
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 21
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 22
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 23
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 24
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro hands-on photo 25

Full specifications

What stands out

Pro camera extras: optical zoom, laser AF

Display

6.8″ · AMOLED · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz
OLED + smooth

A clean OLED panel — colours pop and sunlight visibility is solid.

Screen size
6.8"
Panel type
AMOLED
OLED
Resolution
1080 × 2400 px
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Smooth
Brightness
505 nits
HDR
Not listed
Protection
Corning Gorilla Glass Victus

Performance

Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) · 8-core 3.05 GHz · Mali-G710 MC10
Everyday capable

Daily apps and casual games run smoothly — heavy gaming will drop frames.

Chipset
Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm)
Current CPU tier
Upper mid-range
AnTuTu
1,093,300
v10
GeekBench
3,984
Graphics test
GFXBench 71 fps
CPU
8-core, 3.05 GHz
GPU
Mali-G710 MC10
Process
4 nm
RAM type
RAM LPDDR5
Storage type
UFS Storage 3.1
CPU layout
1x Cortex X2 3.05GHz + 3x Cortex A710 2.85GHz + 4x Cortex A510 1.85GHz

Camera

50 MP f/1.9 main · 32 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
50 MP f/1.9
Telephoto
50 MP f/1.5
Ultrawide
13 MP f/2.2
Front camera
32 MP f/2.5
Main sensor
Samsung GNV, 1/1.31", 1.2µm
Slow motion
Yes, 60 fps
Camera extras
optical zoom, laser AF
Video
4K @ 60 fps
4K video

Battery

5160 mAh · 45 W wired
Plenty

A genuinely all-day battery — comfortably handles streaming and social.

Capacity
5160 mAh
Lab endurance
109:00h
Wired charging
45 W
Removable
No

Audio

Average (-29.3 LUFS)
Loudspeaker
Average (-29.3 LUFS)

Memory

12 GB RAM · 256 GB
Roomy
RAM
12 GB
Storage
256 GB
Storage type
UFS 3.1
Expandable
No

Connectivity

5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
5G
Yes
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
Yes
Contactless
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.3
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
No
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

201 g · 9.0 mm
Height
164.6 mm
Width
72.7 mm
Thickness
9.0 mm
Weight
201 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (under display, optical) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 15

Trades blows 2 wins 3 losses
Smoother display
120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.8″ vs 6.1″ screen · Tradeoff: 1080 × 2400 vs 1179 × 2556 resolution
54% larger battery capacity
45 W vs 15 W charging · 5,160 mAh vs 3,349 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
1.1M vs 1.5M AnTuTu · Upper mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 201 g vs 171 g
vs

Samsung Galaxy S23

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
32% larger battery capacity
45 W vs 25 W charging · 5,160 mAh vs 3,900 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.8″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
1.1M vs 1.8M AnTuTu · Upper mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 60 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 201 g vs 168 g

Where to buy

We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.