Entry-level · 2019
Samsung Galaxy M40
Our Take
CPU benches near recent entry-level phones like the Samsung Galaxy A13 (SM-A137)
A basic entry-level phone — watch out for a smaller battery and slow 15W charging.
Watch out
Smaller battery (3500mAh), 15W charging (slow)
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
What stands out
Pro camera extras: laser AF, manual focus
Display
6.3″ · TFT LCD · 1080 × 2340 · 60 Hz · HDR
Basic
Display
6.3″ · TFT LCD · 1080 × 2340 · 60 Hz · HDR
Basic
Performance
Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) · 8-core 2.0 GHz · Adreno 612
Basic CPU
Performance
Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) · 8-core 2.0 GHz · Adreno 612
Basic CPU
Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.
Camera
32 MP f/1.7 main · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
Camera
32 MP f/1.7 main · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
32 MP f/1.7
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Front camera
16 MP f/2.0
Main sensor
Sony Exmor RS
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Camera extras
laser AF, manual focus
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video
Battery
3500 mAh · 15 W wired
Battery
3500 mAh · 15 W wired
Memory
4 GB RAM · 64 GB · expandable
Tight
Memory
4 GB RAM · 64 GB · expandable
Tight
Connectivity
4G LTE · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
4G LTE · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
168 g · 7.9 mm
Build & Design
168 g · 7.9 mmHeight
155.3 mm
Width
73.9 mm
Thickness
7.9 mm
Weight
168 g
Sensors
Fingerprint (rear-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (rear-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 11
Loses on most
3 losses
Lower benchmark score
177k vs 816k AnTuTu · Entry-level vs Mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection
vs
Samsung Galaxy S10e
Loses on most
5 losses
Weaker display tech
TFT LCD vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.3″ vs 5.8″ screen
Lower benchmark score
177k vs 390k AnTuTu · Entry-level vs Lower mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 168 g vs 150 g
Starts with less storage
64 GB vs 128 GB baseline
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the Samsung Galaxy M40.