Lower mid-range · 2021
Samsung Galaxy F52 5G
Our Take
CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A16
A dependable lower mid-ranger with a 120Hz display.
Strength
120Hz smooth scrolling
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
Display
6.6″ · TFT LCD · 1080 × 2408 · 120 Hz · HDR
Smooth scrolling
Display
6.6″ · TFT LCD · 1080 × 2408 · 120 Hz · HDR
Smooth scrolling
Performance
Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 619
Basic CPU
Performance
Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 619
Basic CPU
Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.
Camera
64 MP f/1.8 main · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
Camera
64 MP f/1.8 main · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
64 MP f/1.8
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
16 MP f/2.0
Main sensor
0.8µm
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video
Battery
4500 mAh · 25 W wired
Battery
4500 mAh · 25 W wired
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
5G · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
199 g · 8.7 mm
Build & Design
199 g · 8.7 mmHeight
164.6 mm
Width
76.3 mm
Thickness
8.7 mm
Weight
199 g
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 13
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
39% larger battery capacity
25 W vs 15 W charging · 4,500 mAh vs 3,240 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
385k vs 1.3M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 199 g vs 174 g
vs
Samsung Galaxy S21 5G
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
13% larger battery capacity
4,500 mAh vs 4,000 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
TFT LCD vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.6″ vs 6.2″ screen
Lower benchmark score
385k vs 899k AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Upper mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 24 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the Samsung Galaxy F52 5G.
Lower mid-range
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
AMOLED screen · NFC included
4GB
128GB
4500mAh
Lower mid-range
Samsung Galaxy M42 5G
AMOLED screen · Bigger battery
6GB
128GB
5000mAh
Lower mid-range
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G
₦280,000
Older (2019) · AMOLED screen
8GB
128GB
4500mAh
Lower mid-range
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G
Bigger battery · NFC included
4GB
64GB
5000mAh