Lower mid-range · 2023
Samsung Galaxy F34
Our Take
CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A25
A dependable lower mid-ranger with all-day battery and an AMOLED screen.
Best for
Streaming · social · long days out
Strength
All-day battery (6000mAh), AMOLED screen
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
What stands out
240 fps slow motion for action clips
Display
6.5″ · Super AMOLED · 1080 × 2340 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Display
6.5″ · Super AMOLED · 1080 × 2340 · 120 Hz · HDR
OLED + smooth
Performance
Exynos 1280 (5 nm) · 8-core 2.4 GHz · Mali-G68
Basic CPU
Performance
Exynos 1280 (5 nm) · 8-core 2.4 GHz · Mali-G68
Basic CPU
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 13 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · OIS · 13 MP selfie · 4K video
OIS + 4K
Stabilised main camera holds up in low light. Front camera is fine for daylight selfies.
Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
OIS
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Camera
2 MP f/2.4
Front camera
13 MP f/2.2
Slow motion
Yes, 240 fps
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video
Battery
6000 mAh · 25 W wired
All-day
Battery
6000 mAh · 25 W wired
All-day
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
208 g · 8.8 mm
Build & Design
208 g · 8.8 mmHeight
161.7 mm
Width
77.2 mm
Thickness
8.8 mm
Weight
208 g
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · compass
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · compassSensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 15
Trades blows
2 wins
3 losses
Smoother display
Super AMOLED vs OLED panel · 120 Hz vs 60 Hz refresh · 6.5″ vs 6.1″ screen
79% larger battery capacity
25 W vs 15 W charging · 6,000 mAh vs 3,349 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
475k vs 1.5M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Lower video ceiling
4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 208 g vs 171 g
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
54% larger battery capacity
6,000 mAh vs 3,900 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
Super AMOLED vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.5″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
475k vs 1.8M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Lower video ceiling
4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 208 g vs 168 g
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the Samsung Galaxy F34.