Lower mid-range · 2022
Samsung Galaxy F23
Our Take
CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A05s
A dependable lower mid-ranger with all-day battery and a 120Hz display.
Best for
Daily driver · WhatsApp · calls
Strength
All-day battery (5000mAh), 120Hz smooth scrolling
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
Display
6.6″ · TFT LCD · 1080 × 2408 · 120 Hz · HDR
Smooth scrolling
Display
6.6″ · TFT LCD · 1080 × 2408 · 120 Hz · HDR
Smooth scrolling
Performance
Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 619
Basic CPU
Performance
Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 619
Basic CPU
Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · 8 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
Camera
50 MP f/1.8 main · 8 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video
A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
8 MP f/2.2
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video
Battery
5000 mAh · 25 W wired
All-day
Battery
5000 mAh · 25 W wired
All-day
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
198 g · 8.4 mm
Build & Design
198 g · 8.4 mmHeight
165.5 mm
Width
77.0 mm
Thickness
8.4 mm
Weight
198 g
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · compass
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · compassSensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 14
Loses on most
1 win
3 losses
52% larger battery capacity
25 W vs 15 W charging · 5,000 mAh vs 3,279 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
330k vs 1.4M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video · 8 MP vs 12 MP selfie
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 198 g vs 172 g
vs
Samsung Galaxy S22 5G
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
35% larger battery capacity
5,000 mAh vs 3,700 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
TFT LCD vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.6″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
330k vs 1.0M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Upper mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 24 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 198 g vs 167 g
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the Samsung Galaxy F23.
