Lower mid-range · 2023
Realme 11
Our Take
CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
A dependable lower mid-ranger with all-day battery and 67W fast charging.
Best for
Daily driver · WhatsApp · calls
Strength
All-day battery (5000mAh), 67W fast charging
Skip if
Heavy gaming or multitasking
Full specifications
What stands out
240 fps slow motion for action clips
Display
6.72″ · IPS LCD · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
Smooth scrolling
Display
6.72″ · IPS LCD · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
Smooth scrolling
Performance
Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Mali-G57 MC2
Basic CPU
Performance
Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Mali-G57 MC2
Basic CPU
Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.
Camera
108 MP f/1.8 main · 16 MP selfie
Camera
108 MP f/1.8 main · 16 MP selfieA standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
108 MP f/1.8
Front camera
16 MP f/2.5
Main sensor
Samsung HM6, 1/1.67", 0.64µm
Slow motion
Yes, 240 fps
Video
1080p @ 30 fps
Battery
5000 mAh · 67 W wired
Plenty
Battery
5000 mAh · 67 W wired
Plenty
Audio
Audio
Speakers
Mono
Microphones
2
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Connectivity
5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
Build & Design
190 g · 8.1 mm
Build & Design
190 g · 8.1 mmHeight
165.7 mm
Width
76.0 mm
Thickness
8.1 mm
Weight
190 g
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximitySensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone 15
Loses on most
1 win
3 losses
49% larger battery capacity
67 W vs 15 W charging · 5,000 mAh vs 3,349 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
443k vs 1.5M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 190 g vs 171 g
vs
Samsung Galaxy S23
Loses on most
1 win
4 losses
28% larger battery capacity
67 W vs 25 W charging · 5,000 mAh vs 3,900 mAh battery
Weaker display tech
IPS LCD vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.72″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
443k vs 1.8M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 30 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 190 g vs 168 g
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.