Entry-level · 2018
Nokia 3.1
Our Take
CPU benches behind recent entry-level phones like the Samsung Galaxy A04e
A basic entry-level phone — watch out for a smaller battery and slow 5W charging.
Watch out
Smaller battery (2990mAh), 5W charging (slow)
Skip if
You watch a lot of video or play demanding games
In the Real World
See how the Nokia 3.1 looks and feels in everyday use.
Full specifications
Display
5.2″ · IPS LCD · 720 × 1440 · 60 Hz · HDR
Basic
Display
5.2″ · IPS LCD · 720 × 1440 · 60 Hz · HDR
Basic
Performance
Mediatek MT6750 (28 nm) · 8-core 1.5 GHz · Mali-T860MP2
Basic CPU
Performance
Mediatek MT6750 (28 nm) · 8-core 1.5 GHz · Mali-T860MP2
Basic CPU
Camera
13 MP f/2.0 main · 8 MP selfie
Camera
13 MP f/2.0 main · 8 MP selfieA standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.
Main camera
13 MP f/2.0
Front camera
8 MP f/2.0
Slow motion
No, 30 fps
Video
1080p @ 30 fps
Battery
2990 mAh · 5 W wired
Plan to charge daily
Battery
2990 mAh · 5 W wired
Plan to charge daily
Memory
2 GB RAM · 16 GB · expandable
Tight
Memory
2 GB RAM · 16 GB · expandable
Tight
Connectivity
4G LTE · NFC · Wi-Fi 4
Connectivity
4G LTE · NFC · Wi-Fi 4
Build & Design
3 g · 8.7 mm
Build & Design
3 g · 8.7 mmHeight
146.3 mm
Width
68.7 mm
Thickness
8.7 mm
Weight
3 g
Sensors
Accelerometer · gyro · proximity · compass
Sensors
Accelerometer · gyro · proximity · compassSensors
Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review
How it stacks up against the rest.
Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.
vs
Apple iPhone XS
Loses on most
5 losses
Lower-resolution screen
IPS LCD vs OLED panel · 720 × 1440 vs 1125 × 2436 resolution · 5.2″ vs 5.8″ screen
Lower benchmark score
53k vs 691k AnTuTu · Entry-level vs Mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Slower charging
5 W vs 15 W charging
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection
vs
Samsung Galaxy S9
Loses on most
5 losses
Lower-resolution screen
IPS LCD vs Super AMOLED panel · 720 × 1440 vs 1440 × 2960 resolution · 5.2″ vs 5.8″ screen
Lower benchmark score
53k vs 416k AnTuTu · Entry-level vs Lower mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Slower charging
5 W vs 15 W charging
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection
Where to buy
We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.
Similar Phones
How each one compares to the Nokia 3.1.
