Lower mid-range · 2020

Motorola One Fusion+

Our Take CPU benches near recent entry-level phones like the Samsung Galaxy A06

A dependable lower mid-ranger with all-day battery — but slow 15W charging shows its age.

Best for Daily driver · WhatsApp · calls
Strength All-day battery (5000mAh)
Watch out 15W charging (slow)
Skip if Heavy gaming or multitasking
Compare

In the Real World

See how the Motorola One Fusion+ looks and feels in everyday use.

Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 1
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 2
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 3
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 4
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 5
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 6
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 7
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 8
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 9
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 10
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 11
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 12
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 13
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 14
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 15
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 16
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 17
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 18
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 19
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 20
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 21
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 22
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 23
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 24
Motorola One Fusion+ hands-on photo 25

Full specifications

What stands out

Pro camera extras: RAW, laser AF

Display

6.5″ · IPS LCD · 1080 × 2340 · 60 Hz · HDR
Basic

A standard LCD panel. Fine indoors, watch out for sunlight legibility.

Screen size
6.5"
Panel type
IPS LCD
Resolution
1080 × 2340 px
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Slow for 2026
Brightness
562 nits
HDR
Supported

Performance

Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 618
Basic CPU

Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.

Chipset
Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm)
Current CPU tier
Lower mid-range
AnTuTu
267,980
GeekBench
1,705
Graphics test
GFXBench 14 fps
CPU
8-core, 2.2 GHz
GPU
Adreno 618
Process
8 nm
RAM type
LPDDR4X RAM
CPU layout
2x Kryo 470 2.2 GHz + 6x Kryo 470 1.8 GHz
Variant differences
Europe: Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730 (8 nm) · India: Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm)

Camera

64 MP f/1.8 main · 16 MP selfie · 4K video
4K video

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
64 MP f/1.8
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Macro
5 MP
Front camera
16 MP f/2.0
Main sensor
Samsung Bright S5KGW1, 1/1.72", 0.8µm
Slow motion
Yes, 120 fps
Camera extras
RAW, laser AF
Video
4K @ 30 fps
4K video

Battery

5000 mAh · 15 W wired
All-day

A genuinely all-day battery — comfortably handles streaming and social.

Capacity
5000 mAh
Lab endurance
136:00h
Wired charging
15 W
Slow for 2026
Removable
No

Audio

Good (-27.9 LUFS)
Loudspeaker
Good (-27.9 LUFS)

Memory

4 GB RAM · 128 GB · expandable
Tight
RAM
4 GB
Tight for 2026
Storage
128 GB
Storage type
UFS 2.1
Expandable
Yes

Connectivity

4G LTE · Wi-Fi 5
5G
No
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
No
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.0
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
Yes
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

210 g · 9.6 mm
Height
162.9 mm
Width
76.4 mm
Thickness
9.6 mm
Weight
210 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (rear-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity

Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 12

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
78% larger battery capacity
5,000 mAh vs 2,815 mAh battery
Lower-resolution screen
IPS LCD vs OLED panel · 1080 × 2340 vs 1170 × 2532 resolution · Tradeoff: 6.5″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
268k vs 1.3M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
No 5G
No 5G vs 5G · No NFC vs NFC
vs

Samsung Galaxy S20

Loses on most 5 losses
Less smooth display
IPS LCD vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · 60 Hz vs 120 Hz refresh · 1080 × 2340 vs 1440 × 3200 resolution
Lower benchmark score
268k vs 623k AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 4K @ 30 fps vs 8K @ 24 fps video
No NFC
No NFC vs NFC
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 210 g vs 163 g

Where to buy

We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.