Lower mid-range · 2022

Motorola Moto G62 5G

Our Take CPU benches near recent lower-mid phones like the Samsung Galaxy A06 5G

A dependable lower mid-ranger with all-day battery and a 120Hz display — but slow 15W charging and 64GB storage show its age.

Best for Daily driver · WhatsApp · calls
Strength All-day battery (5000mAh), 120Hz smooth scrolling
Watch out 15W charging (slow), 64GB storage
Skip if Heavy gaming or multitasking
Compare

In the Real World

See how the Motorola Moto G62 5G looks and feels in everyday use.

Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 1
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 2
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 3
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 4
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 5
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 6
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 7
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 8
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 9
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 10
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 11
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 12
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 13
Motorola Moto G62 5G hands-on photo 14

Full specifications

What stands out

Dolby Atmos for higher-quality listening

Pro camera extras: RAW, laser AF

240 fps slow motion for action clips

Display

6.5″ · IPS LCD · 1080 × 2400 · 120 Hz · HDR
Smooth scrolling

A standard LCD panel. Fine indoors, watch out for sunlight legibility.

Screen size
6.5"
Panel type
IPS LCD
Resolution
1080 × 2400 px
Refresh rate
120 Hz
Smooth
Brightness
552 nits
HDR
Supported

Performance

Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm) · 8-core 2.2 GHz · Adreno 619
Basic CPU

Best for messaging, calls, and light browsing. Avoid heavy multitasking.

Chipset
Qualcomm SM4350-AC Snapdragon 480+ 5G (8 nm)
Current CPU tier
Lower mid-range
AnTuTu
381,000
v9
GeekBench
1,697
Graphics test
GFXBench 14 fps
CPU
8-core, 2.2 GHz
GPU
Adreno 619
Process
8 nm
RAM type
LPDDR4X RAM
CPU layout
2x2.2 GHz Kryo 460 + 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460,

Camera

50 MP f/1.8 main · 16 MP selfie

A standard camera setup — sharp in daylight, expect noise in low light.

Main camera
50 MP f/1.8
Ultrawide
8 MP f/2.2
Macro
2 MP
Front camera
16 MP f/2.2
Main sensor
Samsung S5KJN1, 1/2.76", 0.64µm
Slow motion
Yes, 240 fps
Camera extras
RAW, laser AF
Video
1080p @ 60 fps

Battery

5000 mAh · 15 W wired
All-day

A genuinely all-day battery — comfortably handles streaming and social.

Capacity
5000 mAh
Lab endurance
122:00h
Wired charging
15 W
Slow for 2026
Removable
No

Audio

Very good (-25.9 LUFS) · Stereo · Dolby Atmos
Stereo speakers
Loudspeaker
Very good (-25.9 LUFS)
Speakers
Stereo
Stereo
Dolby Atmos
Supported
Audio features
Dolby Atmos
Microphones
2

Memory

4 GB RAM · 64 GB · expandable
Tight
RAM
4 GB
Tight for 2026
Storage
64 GB
Fills fast
Expandable
Yes

Connectivity

5G · NFC · Wi-Fi 5
5G
Yes
4G LTE
Yes
NFC
Yes
Contactless
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 5
Bluetooth
5.1
GPS systems
GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, SUPL, Galileo
USB
USB-C
USB OTG
Supported
3.5mm jack
Yes
IR blaster
No
SIM
1× Nano-SIM

Build & Design

184 g · 8.6 mm
Height
161.8 mm
Width
74.0 mm
Thickness
8.6 mm
Weight
184 g

Sensors

Fingerprint (side-mounted) · accelerometer · gyro · proximity
Sensors
Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Specifications sourced from GSMArena · Read full review

Independent Test Scores

Lab-tested scores from DXOMark — independent measurements, not manufacturer claims. Tap any card to view photo samples and the full review.

Scores are on DXOMark's open-ended 0–200 scale. Higher is better.

How it stacks up against the rest.

Quick reads against a few phones in the same price tier. Tap any one for the deep comparison.

vs

Apple iPhone 14

Loses on most 1 win 4 losses
52% larger battery capacity
5,000 mAh vs 3,279 mAh battery
Lower benchmark score
381k vs 1.4M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs High-end tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 60 fps vs 4K @ 60 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 184 g vs 172 g
Starts with less storage
64 GB vs 128 GB baseline
vs

Samsung Galaxy S22 5G

Loses on most 5 losses
Weaker display tech
IPS LCD vs Dynamic AMOLED panel · Tradeoff: 6.5″ vs 6.1″ screen
Lower benchmark score
381k vs 1.0M AnTuTu · Lower mid-range vs Upper mid-range tier
Less stable camera
No OIS vs OIS · 1080p @ 60 fps vs 8K @ 24 fps video
Less protected
None vs IP68 protection · 184 g vs 167 g
Starts with less storage
64 GB vs 128 GB baseline

Where to buy

We don't have any listings for this phone yet. Try searching on Konga or Jiji.